ABSTRACT
The debate exists whether or not gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) impair endometrial receptivity.Homeobox A11 (Hoxall),Meis homeobox 1 (Meisl),cadherin 1 (Cdhl),and catenin beta 1 (Ctnnbl) are well known to be involved in successful implantation.In this study,the endometrial expression of Hoxall,Meisl,Cdhl,and Ctnnbl during the peri-implantation period was investigated in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) mouse model by real-time RT-PCR and Western blot to evaluate the relationship between Hoxall,Meisl,Cdhl,and Ctnnbl expression and the impact of the COH on endometrial receptivity.The mimic COH protocols included GnRH agonist plus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) (GnRH agonist group),GnRH antagonist plus HMG (GnRH antagonist group),and HMG alone (HMG group).The expression levels of Hoxall,Meisl,Cdhl,and Ctnnbl mRNA and protein were decreased in all of the COH groups.The expression levels of Hoxall and Ctnnbl were the lowest in the GnRH agonist group,and those of Meisl and Cdbl were lower in the GnRH analog groups than the HMG group.There were positive correlations between the expression of Hoxall and Ctnnbl,as well as the expression of Meisl and Cdhl among all the groups.In conclusion,the COH protocols,particularly with GnRH analogs,suppressed Hoxall,Meisl,Ctnnbl and Cdhl expression,in mouse endometrium during the peri-implantation period.Our data reveal a novel molecular mechanism by which the COH protocols might impair endometrial receptivity.
ABSTRACT
To assess the relationship between pronuclear scoring and day-3 embryo quality and pregnancy outcome and to determine the clinical value of pronuclear stage scoring system in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (WF-ET) program, a pronuclear scoring system was used to score zygotes 16-20 h after insemination during conventional WF or intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion (ICS1). The embryos were classified into groups Z1, Z2, Z3 and Z4. Comparisons were made of the rates of arrested embryos and excellent embryos on day 3. Comparisons of pregnancy outcome were made only in those patients in whom cohorts of similarly Z-scored embryos were transferred. The results showed that there were less arrested embryos and more excellent embryos on day 3 in groups Z1 and Z2 than those in group Z3 and Z4. More embryos arrested and less excellent embryos developed in group Z4 than group Z3. The clinical pregnancy rates resulting from the transfer of single pronuclear score homologous embryo types were similar among groups Z1, Z2 and Z3. Implanta- tion rates of group Z1 were higher (P<0.05) than that of group Z3. These findings suggests that pro- nuclear scoring can predict developmental ability on day 3 and implantation potential. A evaluation that combines the Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology is useful in the determination of the most viable embryos and the number of embryos for transfer.
ABSTRACT
Summary: In order to compare GnRH agonist with antagonist protocol for the same patient during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, the in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome was retrospectively studied in 81 patients undergoing 105 agonist protocols and 88 antagonist protocols. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in duration of ovarian stimulation, number of ampoules, oocytes retrieved, serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels,thickness of endometrium, the zygote-and blastocyst-developmcnt rate between GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols (P>0.05). High quality embryo rate was higher in antagonist protocols, but there was no significant difference between two protocols. Implantation rate and clinical pregnant rate were significantly higher in antagonist protocol (15.82% and 30.26%, respectively) than in agonist protocol (5.26% and 10.64% respectively (P<0.05). It was concluded GnRH antagonist protocol probably improved the outcome of pregnancy of older patients with a history of multiple failure of IVF-ET in a GnRH protocol.